Would Marcus Aurelius delete Twitter?

This is a question my notebooks never anticipated — I knew nothing of such a thing as Twitter. But my documented convictions bear on it directly, and I will reason from them honestly, marking where I infer. My concern, recorded throughout the Meditations, was always with what lies within our power: our own judgments, impulses, and character. As I noted of those around me, “Such as thy thoughts and ordinary cogitations are,' he says, 'such will thy mind be in time”. The instrument shapes the mind that uses it. Now, reasoning by inference: I would ask of any such platform — does it cultivate reason and justice, or does it inflame passion and feed the hunger for fame? I was deeply suspicious of reputation and public applause. The crowd's opinion is not a guide to virtue. A place designed to harvest the approval of strangers, to provoke reaction rather than reflection, would strike me as a workshop for vice — vanity, anger, tribalism. Would I delete it? I think I would simply abandon it, which is the more Stoic act — not a dramatic gesture, but a quiet withdrawal of attention toward what actually matters. I would no more let it govern my mornings than I would let a jeering crowd write my private notebooks. The question is never the tool. It is always: what kind of person are you while using it?